Dracula

Took me a long time to finish this classic of literature. I'm glad I read it, but I doubt I will go back to it. I liked a few of the characters, though for such a long novel (about 400 pages), there weren't many and they were poorly developed, like Lord Arthur Godalming and Quincey Morris and even Jonathan Harker. The two women--Lucy Westenra and Mina Murray-Harker--were interesting and unique, as was the memorable Dr. Abraham Van Helsing, easily the coolest character of the bunch. The lunatic Renfield was more interesting than his doctor (Seward). Told in an epistolary, multi-media style, the novel seemed fragmented and disjointed in its early stages, but it started to make sense later on, and I can see why he did it that way. Stoker paced himself throughout, taking an awfully long time to develop his ideas, and while it seemed to move too slowly early on, the ending was tense. Hard to keep up with the reading early because it was so slow, but the middle was good, once Lucy died. The woman just kept hanging on, disappointingly. Anyway, Dracula himself was uninteresting and actually kind of weak, though his "capture" of Jonathan in the beginning was scary. The final third of the book turned out to be more of a battle of wits than a physical fight, which I liked much more. In almost every physical confrontation, Dracula fled. Kind of a weakling for a creature of ultimate evil. I was actually more afraid of the three Women of Darkness from his castle than I was of him.